11/28/2023 0 Comments Long life pokiHe got fully integrated into the family of the deceased. In return, the respondent grew up as a member of the Opus family. The deceased even gave him for cultivation. The respondent was educated by the deceased and when he was of marrying age, he paid the cows for that purpose. The respondent grew up in deceased’s home as a son, and was treated as such by all including the deceased. This was in agreement with the ‘father’ of the boy. Sometimes in his life, he brought in the respondent who was then a young boy to stay with him as his son. The deceased did not produce any child from any of his wives. The deceased left a window, the 1 st one having died before the husband. The evidence on record as accepted by the trial magistrate was that both the appellant and the respondent were relatives of the deceased. The facts from which this appeal arises are rather simple. The Magistrate Grade 1 who heard the matter decided it in favour of the respondent, who was the defendant in that court. The appellant brought the respondent to the Magistrate’s court contesting the grant to the respondent of letters of administration to the estate of the late Opus Bisaleri. ISALE JOHN MICHAEL………………………………………RESPONDENTīEFORE: THE HON.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |